No Chocolates and Flowers For U.S. Troops In Iraq

*Comparison with Vietnam back again! Lessons, what lessons? Cannot be true. It is a piece of leftist, anti-war propaganda. The chocolates and flowers are late in coming. The Iraqis will eventually greet us as liberators after the Iraq they knew ceases to exist. Thomas E. Ricks write in the Post: "In Iraq, Military Forgot Lessons of Vietnam"But there is also strong evidence, based on a review of thousands of military documents and hundreds of interviews with military personnel, that the U.S. approach to pacifying Iraq in the months after the collapse of Hussein helped spur the insurgency and made it bigger and stronger than it might have been.Killings Legitimized - ROETrust them to find justification for murder of civilians -- Rules of Engagement (ROE). Soldiers facing charges for killing Iraqi civilians are being defended on the ground that their actions were based on ROE. That is how we are going to win the hearts and minds of Iraqis! "Army Lt. Col. John W. McClory found that Spec. Nathan B. Lynn, 21, of South Williamsport, Pa., did nothing wrong in shooting Gani Ahmad Zaben in the post-curfew darkness outside a group of homes on Feb. 15. McClory ruled that Lynn thought the man was armed with an AK-47 and believed he was a threat."The military ROE in Iraq are central to most homicide cases against U.S. troops and are at the heart of a major investigation into the killings of two dozen civilians in a group of homes in Haditha. Lawyers representing several Marines in that case -- which has so far yielded no charges -- have said they plan to argue that their clients were following the ROE when they thought they were under attack.Yesterday, the Associated Press reported that four Army soldiers charged with killing three detainees they captured in raids near Samarra told investigators their ROE were to kill "all military-age males." They said commanders authorized the rules for a special mission and initially cleared them of wrongdoing, according to the AP.

July 23, 2006 · 2 min · musafir

Bombs for Lebanon With Love From Uncle Sam

The New BarbariansAll of them are not on the Lebanese side of the border.The New York TimesJuly 22, 2006WeaponsU.S. Speeds Up Bomb Delivery for the IsraelisBy DAVID S. CLOUD and HELENE COOPERWASHINGTON, July 21 -- The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, American officials said Friday.The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said. Its disclosure threatens to anger Arab governments and others because of the appearance that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign in a way that could be compared to Iran'’s efforts to arm and resupply Hezbollah.The munitions that the United States is sending to Israel are part of a multimillion-dollar arms sale package approved last year that Israel is able to draw on as needed, the officials said. But Israel'’s request for expedited delivery of the satellite and laser-guided bombs was described as unusual by some military officers, and as an indication that Israel still had a long list of targets in Lebanon to strike.The numbers speak.Yesterday's casualties ...

July 22, 2006 · 2 min · musafir

You, Me, and President Bush: Summer Reading

So Many Books, So Little TimeList of books for summer are out. As usual, a mixed bag. In NPR I found comments by Chris Lehman about Jonathan Ames' favorite --- The Dain Curse by Dashiell Hammett. I must confess that I am not familiar with Jonathan Ames but Hammett, who lived in San Francisco and served a sentence for his refusal to cooperate with HUAC, is one of my favorites too. Another great author of whodunits from that era is Raymond Chandler. Just finished re-reading The Raymond Chandler Omnibus which contains four of his Philip Marlowe novels. Lady in the Lake, Farewell My Lovely, The Big Sleep, The High Window . Hard to put down.Nancy Pearl lists "Books That May Make You Skip Work":The Brief History of the Dead - Kevin BrockmeierThe Little Friend - Donna TarttThe Girls - Lori LansensCitizen Vince - Jess WaltersHer non-fiction choice is: To Rule the Waves by Arthur HermannI am reading E.L. Doctorow's "The March", a Civil War story. 1864 -- General Sherman's march through Georgia after the burning of Atlanta. I like Doctorow and I have an interest in the Civil War. See "Independence Day 2005 and A Stillness At Appomattox"These are books for us ordinary people. August is around the corner. That is when the president goes to Crawford for his vacation. Do you have any idea of what the president reads? No fiction for him. He is a heavy hitter, constantly educating his mind, or so it would seem according to The Guardian which listed the books he took with him to Crawford last summer. Among them "The Great Influenza: The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague in History by John M Barry." One wonders. Well, as long as no one asks him about the contents the president is safe."The greatest gift is a passion for reading. It is cheap, it consoles, it distracts, it excites, it gives you the knowledge of the world and experience of a wide kind. It is a moral illumination."--- Elizabeth Hardwick ...

July 22, 2006 · 2 min · musafir

How to Make An Omlette: The G.W. Bush Way

Bush, the Peacemaker * Bush, the Black Vote Seeker It was not a secret. At the beginning of the current conflict in Lebanon our president made his position clear about the right side with some platitudes about minimizing civilian casualties in Lebanon. For him the timing couldn't have been better. He probably gloated about the developments -- the opportunity to strike back at a Shiaite militant group backed by arch-enemies Iran and Syria without being directly involved in military action. An example of how to make an omelette without breaking an egg. Michael Abramowitz writes in the Post: "In Mideast Strife, Bush Sees a Step To Peace". He would....I mean "see a step to peace" in the inferno that is Lebanon. A good return for all the financial and military aid to Israel. When hostilities have broken out in the past, the usual U.S. response has been an immediate and public bout of diplomacy aimed at a cease-fire, in the hopes of ensuring that the crisis would not escalate. This week, however, even in the face of growing international demands, the White House has studiously avoided any hint of impatience with Israel. While making it plain it wants civilian casualties limited, the administration is also content to see the Israelis inflict the maximum damage possible on Hezbollah. Nomination for Nobel Peace Prize?Bottom Line: Republicans Need Black VotersHe went there not quite with his hat in his hand but admitted that the Republican Party had neglected black voters. What falling poll numbers will do! Apparently, Karl Rove decided that it was time to repair the damage. After scornfully avoiding appearance at NAACP's annual convention in the past five years, yesterday President Bush read a speech before the gathering. Black voters are not going to shift their allegiance en masse because of the speech but his appearance could sway some of them. The President's support of the Voting Rights Act didn't hurt. The administration's records display an abysmal failure of programs for benefit of people at the lower end of our society, not only African Americans. That is not going to change. The courtship will not last. The Post: "I understand that many African Americans distrust my political party," Bush said at the gathering in Washington. "I want to change the relationship." Bush's remarks met with largely lukewarm applause from the crowd and at one point near the end of his speech, two hecklers threatened to disrupt the address. The president pressed ahead undaunted, though.Bush said the Republican Party wrote off the country's African-American vote for too long and many African-Americans also wrote off the Republican Party. "It's not good for our country," Bush said. Mid-East War Crimes"The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour has warned that war crimes may have been committed in the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. BBC News website World Affairs correspondent Paul Reynolds examines the issues." Comments Justiceiro — 2006-07-21 I think you are, as many on the arab side of the arab-israeli do, placing too much weight behind the idea that Washington can pull Israel's strings like a puppetmaster. The US may be Israel's "best friend", but they are not unconditionally friendly, noris Israel unconditionally friendly to eht US (google "USS Liberty" to see what I mean). It's hard to find a harsher American critic of Israel than me; but even I have difficulty seeing how israel could have attempted to settle this (the kidnapping and rocket firing) through negotiation. I think the wantonness and level of destruction is disproportionate, but its very clearly a result of frustration felt by Israel, the frustration brought on by a totally intractable and foolish Hezbollah. At this point Hezbollah can't give the soldiers back, because it would lose face (which makes Israel's public invasion rather stupid, they should have counterkidnapped Nasrullah's cousin or something and privately squeezed his balls, allowing Hezbollah to make a "magnanimous gesture" or something, of course of their own free will.) What's really pathetic is that Hezbollah is, much like a drug dealing Los Angeles street gang, more concerned about "street cred" than the people it purports to defend and represent. The only reason they kidnapped two people is because Hamas kidnapped one, and they HAD to look better than Hamas. It started out as a Hezbollah-Hamas pissing contest, and unfortunately the Lebanese people are the ones taking the consequences. As far as the USA being involved, I think not. You can't argue for the USA to get involved in the conflict in Lebanon, but not in Iraq. Either the USA is an imperial arbiter, or it isn't. I prefer it not to be. musafir — 2006-07-21 ".......on the Arab side"? Not quite true although I often find myself on the side of the underdogs. In this instance my position is based on what you described as "wantonness and level of destruction" and compassion for the hapless civilians caught in the middle. Thanks for your comments.

July 21, 2006 · 4 min · musafir

Destruction of Lebanon

It is a naked demonstration of power. Power of vastly superior military force. Let the pundits argue about "over reaction" and Hezbollah's "miscalculation". It is indisputable that Israel is determined to destroy Lebanon's economy and infrastructure. If hapless civilians get caught in the attacks and die, it is the cost they must pay to be Lebanese or a resident of Lebanon. President Bush made it clear where he stood on the issue; according to him the Israelis are defending themselves. The peace mission by Secretary Rice is not likely to take place until the Israelis have achieved their objective, world opinion be damned. But in the long run are they really going to be safe? For every innocent life they take they create a recruit for extremist Islamic groups. They can be defiant but at the cost of being despised not only in the Middle East but also in much of the civilized world. Misery and suffering being inflicted upon thousands of people are bound to have a long lasting effect that will bode Israel no good. Washington Post: "The United States faces growing tensions with allies over its support of Israel's military campaign to cripple Hezbollah, amid calls for a cease-fire to help with the mounting humanitarian crisis."European allies are particularly alarmed about the disproportionately high civilian death toll in Lebanon. They are also concerned that the U.S. position will increase tensions between the Islamic world and the West by fueling militants, playing into the rhetoric of Osama bin Laden and adding to the problems of the U.S.-led coalition force in Iraq.The fragile Lebanese government has pleaded for a cease-fire, and France has urged the U.N. Security Council to adopt a resolution calling for an end to hostilities, proposing political and security measures. France also has called for "humanitarian corridors" to guarantee safety for civilians fleeing areas under fire.More than 500,000 people -- about one in eight in a country smaller than Connecticut -- have been displaced, according to the Lebanese government. Comments Anonymous — 2006-07-20 I have not much doubt that US "keyhole" satellite photos are being shared with the Israelis. Lets not mince words. This is a preemptive proxy war between Iran and the US. The Arab and Persian countries will be rightfully enraged for another generation. I'm an American, but the federal government of this country ceased to represent me when this moronic administration took office. God help us.

July 20, 2006 · 2 min · musafir

The Endless Loop - E-Mail between An Israeli and A Lebanese

Henry Kissinger, Former Aider and Abetter of Torture and Murder, Pontificates * India Blocks BloggersGordon Orr in Shlomo, Israel, and Saleem Khoury in Beirut, Lebanon. The BBC deserves praise for publishing them but the e-mail messages between an Israeli and a Lebanese made me despair of any lasting solution to the crisis in the Middle East. Their minds are set; they talk without listening and,unfortunately, there is no leading voice on either side to set the right tone.Saleem KhouryI do not believe that Israel ever had the intention of fighting Hezbollah. From the first day of their attack, they only wanted to destroy our civilian infrastructure.The fighters of Hezbollah are in the south and Israel hasn't sent a single tank there. Instead they destroy the civilian airport, bridges and power plants. How can they justify that?Lebanon has lost many civilians - children, old people, all trying to escape. In Beirut, we haven't been able to go to work. Life has stopped.Maybe Israel has a special obscure and twisted logic that nobody else understands I do not know how such actions will free their two soldiers.Gordon OrrI live in Shlomi on the border with Lebanon. I can see a Hezbollah lookout post from my balcony.Shlomi was among the settlements shelled on Wednesday morning. This shelling brought Israeli soldiers to the border area where they were ambushed: seven were killed and two were kidnapped.What option did Israel have? Should we have said: 'Well done Mr Nasrallah, got us this time, we'll do whatever you want' And for what purpose?This was Nasrallah [Hezbollah's chief] trying to improve his standing in the Arab world.It is difficult to believe that the interest of the Lebanese people was in his mind when he gave the order for this.What others call negotiating is really a call to give in blindly to his demands, and that puts my life and the life of every other Israeli at risk.On and on ad infinitum. In the news this morning: "At least 49 civilians have been killed in Israeli air strikes in Lebanon.At least 12 people died and about 30 were wounded in the southern village of Srifa, near Tyre, where residents said several homes were flattened."--- BBCOne of Our Elder Statesmen, A Friend of ButchersDr. Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of State, who was the architect of our Latin American policy under which thousands of dissidents were killed and tortured in Chile and Argentina, appeared on Newshour to talk about negotiating peace in the Middle East. He had also supported General Suharto's repressive measures against the East Timorese. Kissinger is truly a man without shame and conscience.Censorship Raises Its Ugly Head in IndiaBBC 19th July 2006:"India's burgeoning blogging community is up in arms against a government directive that they say has led to the blocking of their web logs.The country's 153 internet service providers (ISP) have blocked 17 websites since last week on federal government orders. " BBCInternet professionals and lawyers believe that blocking sites really serves no purpose in a large country like India with an increasingly thriving blogging community."The ISPs can block a specific site, but the person who runs it can easily tweak its name a bit and return," says Mr Tiwari.There are an estimated 50 million internet users in India, according to ISP industry estimates.Only seven million people subscribe to the internet, of whom 1.5 million receive broadband services.

July 19, 2006 · 3 min · musafir

The First Veto by Our President - Crusader Against Evil

Stem Cell Research, Morning After Pill, Women's Right to ChooseThe warrior is about to put his money where his mouth is -- ready with his pen to sign the first veto. The issue: Federal funding for stem cell research. It will play well in certain quarters. "But Bush is unwilling to tolerate deviations from his policy restricting federal funding for stem cell research that he set out in his first prime-time television address in August 2001. If all goes as scheduled later this week, he will do something he has avoided for nearly six years: veto a bill.""The president feels he made the right decision, and a principled decision, and he's not going to be swayed by the fact that he may not have the votes on Capitol Hill," said Jay Lefkowitz, a New York lawyer who helped Bush craft his position while a staff member at the White House.By refusing to budge from his position, the president also appears to be reaffirming his bona fides with religious conservatives who make up an important part of his political base, even while he differs with other prominent Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) and former first lady Nancy Reagan.Recent reports leave no doubt that the president has supporters among health care workers. Where Are We Heading?A sign of the times. Things have come to such a stage in our 'land of the free' that one has to look into religious orientation of doctors and nurses at local hospitals before seeking care. Did healthcare workers always refuse service to those whose needs infringed on their religious beliefs or are such actions resulted from the Bush Administration's overt support for them? I am with those who feel that people with strong religious convictions ought not to choose a field of work in which they are likely to face such decisions. Rob Stein in the Washington Post: "In Chicago, an ambulance driver refused to transport a patient for an abortion. In California, fertility specialists rebuffed a gay woman seeking artificial insemination. In Texas, a pharmacist turned away a rape victim seeking the morning-after pill." Excerpts:Around the United States, health workers and patients are clashing when providers balk at giving care that they feel violates their beliefs, sparking an intense, complex and often bitter debate over religious freedom vs. patients' rights.Legal and political battles have followed. Patients are suing and filing complaints after being spurned. Workers are charging religious discrimination after being disciplined or fired. Congress and more than a dozen states are considering laws to compel workers to provide care -- or, conversely, to shield them from punishment.The issue is driven by the rise in religious expression and its political prominence in the United States, and by medicine's push into controversial new areas. And it is likely to intensify as doctors start using embryonic stem cells to treat disease, as more states legalize physician-assisted suicide and as other wrenching issues emerge.For Debra Shipley, her duties as a nurse began to conflict with her Christian faith when the county health clinic where she worked near Memphis required she dispense the morning-after pill."I felt like my religious liberties were being violated," said Shipley, 49, of Atoka, Tenn. "I could not live with myself if it did it. I answer to God first and foremost."But Paige Gerson, 37, of Leawood, Kan., believes doctors and nurses should never let their personal values interfere with patient care. Her doctor refused to give her the morning-after pill, citing religious objections.There is more"Seeking Care, and Refused". Love of God, fear of God, or just inability to accept those who are different?Desperate to have a baby, Guadalupe Benitez was hoping her next try would finally work. So Benitez was stunned when a crucial moment arrived in her cycle and her fertility clinic refused to do the insemination procedure."I was in tears," said Benitez, 34, of Oceanside, Calif. "I wanted to be a mom. I was in a panic."The clinic told Benitez, who is gay, that staff members were uncomfortable about treating her because of their religious values. "I couldn't believe what I was hearing. It was almost surreal," Benitez said. "It was so upsetting."Benitez eventually conceived a boy, then twin girls, with the help of another specialist. But she sued the clinic and two of its doctors in 2001, charging discrimination."For Some, There is No ChoiceWhen the dispatcher called, Stephanie Adamson knew this might be the run she had feared. But it wasn't until her ambulance arrived at the hospital and she saw the words "elective abortion" on the patient's chart that she knew she had to make a choice."I just got a sick feeling in my stomach," said Adamson, an emergency medical technician from Channahon, Ill. Adamson called her boss to say she could not transport the patient to the other hospital where the procedure was scheduled.And MoreFederally funded "pregnancy resource centers" are incorrectly telling women that abortion results in an increased risk of breast cancer, infertility and deep psychological trauma, a minority congressional report charged yesterday. Comments Anonymous — 2006-07-19 I would like to personally thank the President for stopping this unfit piece of legislation. If the research was truly work the money, private organizations would be willing to pay the monet. musafir — 2006-07-19 The White House would be happy to receive your comments, typos and all. I suppose one can request a meeting with the president to personally thank him but I wouldn't bet on receiving an appointment.

July 18, 2006 · 5 min · musafir

Sound Bites, Photo Ops, and Reality

Paul Krugman Exposes the Sham Paul Krugman's collection of quotations demonstrates the lies and utterly cynical positions held by the president and his supporters. Perhaps they are without memories; for them the past is a blank slate, each day a new day.March of FollyPaul Krugman, The New York Times,July 17, 2006"Since those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it --— and since the cast of characters making pronouncements on the crisis in the Middle East is very much the same as it was three or four years ago -- it seems like a good idea to travel down memory lane. Here'’s what they said and when they said it:"“The greatest thing to come out of [invading Iraq] for the world economy would be $20 a barrel for oil."” Rupert Murdoch, chairman of News Corporation (which owns Fox News), February 2003"“Oil Touches Record $78 on Mideast Conflict."” Headline on www.foxnews.com, July 14, 2006"“The administration'’s top budget official estimated today that the cost of a war with Iraq could be in the range of $50 billion to $60 billion,"” saying that "“earlier estimates of $100 billion to $200 billion in Iraq war costs by Lawrence B. Lindsey, Mr. Bush'’s former chief economic adviser, were too high."” The New York Times, Dec. 31, 2002"“According to C.B.O.'’s estimates, from the time U.S. forces invaded Iraq in March 2003, $290 billion has been allocated for activities in Iraq." Additional costs over the 2007-2016 period would total an estimated $202 billion under the first [optimistic] scenario, and $406 billion under the second one."” Congressional Budget Office, July 13, 2006"“Peacekeeping requirements in Iraq might be much lower than historical experience in the Balkans suggests. There'’s been none of the record in Iraq of ethnic militias fighting one another that produced so much bloodshed and permanent scars in Bosnia."” Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of defense and now president of the World Bank, Feb. 27, 2003"“West Baghdad is no stranger to bombings and killings, but in the past few days all restraint has vanished in an orgy of '‘ethnic cleansing.'’ Shia gunmen are seeking to drive out the once-dominant Sunni minority and the Sunnis are forming neighborhood posses to retaliate. Mosques are being attacked. Scores of innocent civilians have been killed, their bodies left lying in the streets."” The Times of London, July 14, 2006"“Earlier this week, I traveled to Baghdad to visit the capital of a free and democratic Iraq."” President Bush, June 17, 2006"“People are doing the same as [in] Saddam'’s time and worse. " These were the precise reasons that we fought Saddam and now we are seeing the same things."” Ayad Allawi, Mr. Bush'’s choice as Iraq'’s first post-Saddam prime minister, November 2005"“Iraq'’s new government has another able leader in Speaker Mashhadani. He rejects the use of violence for political ends. And by agreeing to serve in a prominent role in this new unity government, he'’s demonstrating leadership and courage."” President Bush, May 22, 2006"“Some people say ‘we saw you beheading, kidnappings and killing. In the end we even started kidnapping women who are our honor."’ These acts are not the work of Iraqis. I am sure that he who does this is a Jew and the son of a Jew."” Mahmoud Mashhadani, speaker of the Iraqi Parliament, July 13, 2006"“My fellow citizens, not only can we win the war in Iraq, we are winning the war in Iraq."” President Bush, Dec. 18, 2005"“I think I would answer that by telling you I don'’t think we'’re losing."” Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, when asked whether we'’re winning in Iraq, July 14, 2006"“Regime change in Iraq would bring about a number of benefits for the region. Extremists in the region would have to rethink their strategy of jihad. Moderates throughout the region would take heart, and our ability to advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process would be enhanced."” Vice President Dick Cheney, Aug. 26, 2002"“Bush --— The world is coming unglued before his eyes. His naive dreams are a Wilsonian disaster."” Newsweek Conventional Wisdom Watch, July 24, 2006 edition"“'It's time for Democrats who distrust President Bush to acknowledge that he will be the commander in chief for three more critical years, and that in matters of war, we undermine presidential credibility at our nation'’s peril."” Senator Joseph Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, Dec. 6, 2005"“I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now."” Representative Tom DeLay, Republican of Texas, on the campaign against Slobodan Milosevic, April 28, 1999 Comments Anonymous — 2006-07-17 Mr. Krugman's superbly written piece fails because it doesn't go back to the false premise of the war; That Saddam Hussein in alliance with OBL planned and implemented the attacks on 911. All assertions are provable from a false premise. Since we (Americans) have permitted the administration to adhere to the ridiculous notions of what happened on 911, permitting these additional indiscretions is only a minor sin. Mr. Krugman should begin by questioning why the president did not use his authority to stop the three hijacked, but yet to be crashed, airliners before he entered the Booker elementary classroom on 911. I will hazard a guess to say that most Americans continue to believe Michael Moore's assertion that the president found out only when Andrew Card whispered in his ear. Mr. Krugman, please lead Americans to an independent, honest investigation of the events of 911. Those who died and those who have survived deserve answers.

July 17, 2006 · 5 min · musafir

The Cowboy From Crawford and His Missions Not Accomplished

Smoke and Mirrors, and "Filters" "Now it is Operation Together Forward! You'll have to give credit to the team that concocts the names for the president's grand illusions. Look behind the sound bite and there is nothing, absolutely nothing. Timely column by Frank Rich, NY Times. A must read.From Those Wonderful Folks Who Gave You 'Axis of Evil'AS American foreign policy lies in ruins from Pyongyang to Baghdad to Beirut, its epitaph is already being written in Washington. Last week’s Time cover, “The End of Cowboy Diplomacy,” lays out the conventional wisdom: the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war, upended by chaos in Iraq and the nuclear intransigence of North Korea and Iran, is now officially kaput. In its stead, a sadder but more patient White House, under the sway of Condi Rice, is embracing the fine art of multilateral diplomacy and dumping the “bring ’em on” gun-slinging that got the world into this jam.The only flaw in this narrative — a big one — is that it understates the administration’s failure by assuming that President Bush actually had a grand, if misguided, vision in the first place. Would that this were so. But in truth this presidency never had a vision for the world. It instead had an idée fixe about one country, Iraq, and in pursuit of that obsession recklessly harnessed American power to gut-driven improvisation and P.R. strategies, not doctrine. This has not changed, even now.Only if we remember that the core values of this White House are marketing and political expediency, not principle and substance, can we fully grasp its past errors and, more important, decipher the endgame to come. The Bush era has not been defined by big government or small government but by virtual government. Its enduring shrine will be a hollow Department of Homeland Security that finds more potential terrorist targets in Indiana than in New York.Like his father, George W. Bush always disdained the vision thing. He rode into office on the heels of a boom, preaching minimalist ambitions reminiscent of the 1920’s boom Republicanism of Harding and Coolidge. Mr. Bush’s most fervent missions were to cut taxes, pass a placebo patients’ bill of rights and institute the education program he sold as No Child Left Behind. His agenda was largely exhausted by the time of his fateful Crawford vacation in August 2001, so he talked vaguely of immigration reform and announced a stem-cell research “compromise.” But he failed to seriously lead on either issue, both of which remain subjects of toxic debate today. To appear busy once he returned to Washington after Labor Day, he cooked up a typically alliterative “program” called Communities of Character, a grab bag of “values” initiatives inspired by polling data. That was forgotten after the Qaeda attacks. But the day that changed everything didn’t change the fundamental character of the Bush presidency. The so-called doctrine of pre-emption, a repackaging of the long-held Cheney-Rumsfeld post-cold-war mantra of unilateralism, was just another gaudy float in the propaganda parade ginned up to take America to war against a country that did not attack us on 9/11. As the president’s chief of staff then, Andrew Card, famously said of the Iraq war just after Labor Day 2002, “From a marketing point of view, you don’t introduce new products in August.” The Bush doctrine was rolled out officially two weeks later, just days after the administration’s brass had fanned out en masse on the Sunday-morning talk shows to warn that Saddam’s smoking gun would soon come in the form of a mushroom cloud.The Bush doctrine was a doctrine in name only, a sales strategy contrived to dress up the single mission of regime change in Iraq with philosophical grandiosity worthy of F.D.R. There was never any serious intention of militarily pre-empting either Iran or North Korea, whose nuclear ambitions were as naked then as they are now, or of striking the countries that unlike Iraq were major enablers of Islamic terrorism. Axis of Evil was merely a clever brand name from the same sloganeering folks who gave us '“compassionate conservatism'” and '“a uniter, not a divider'” --— so clever that the wife of a presidential speechwriter, David Frum, sent e-mails around Washington boasting that her husband was the '“Axis of Evil'” author. (Actually, only '“axis'” was his.)Since then, the administration has fiddled in Iraq while Islamic radicalism has burned brighter and the rest of the Axis of Evil, not to mention Afghanistan and the Middle East, have grown into just the gathering threat that Saddam was not. And there'’s still no policy. As Ivo Daalder of the Brookings Institution writes on his foreign-affairs blog, Mr. Bush isn'’t pursuing diplomacy in his post-cowboy phase so much as '“a foreign policy of empty gestures'” consisting of 'strong words here; a soothing telephone call and hasty meetings there.'” The ambition is not to control events but '“to kick the proverbial can down the road '— far enough so the next president can deal with it.'” There is no plan for victory in Iraq, only a wish and a prayer that the apocalypse won'’t arrive before Mr. Bush retires to his ranch.But for all the administration'’s setbacks, its core belief in P.R. remains unshaken. Or at least its faith in domestic P.R. (It has never cared about the destruction of America'’s image abroad by our countenance of torture.) That marketing imperative, not policy, was once again the driving vision behind the latest Iraq offensive: the joint selling of the killing of Zarqawi, the formation of the new Maliki government, the surprise presidential trip to the Green Zone and the rollout of Operation Together Forward to secure Baghdad more than three years after its liberation from Saddam.Operation Together Forward is just the latest model of the Axis of Evil gimmick. In his Rose Garden press conference last month, Mr. Bush promised that this juggernaut of crack Iraqi troops and American minders would '“increase the number of checkpoints, enforce a curfew and implement a strict weapons ban across the Iraqi capital.'” It'’s been predictably downhill ever since. After two weeks of bloodshed, Col. Jeffrey Snow of the Army explained that the operation was a success even if the patient, Iraq, was dying, because '“we expected that there would be an increase in the number of attacks.'” Last week, the American ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, allowed that there would be '“adjustments'” to the plan and that the next six months (why is it always six months?) would be critical. Gen. George Casey spoke of tossing more American troops into the Baghdad shooting gallery to stave off disaster.So what'’s the latest White House strategy to distract from the escalating mayhem? Yet another P.R. scheme, in this case drawn from the playbook of fall 2003, when the president countered news of the growing Iraq insurgency by going around the media '“filter'” to speak to the people through softball interviews with regional media outlets. Thus the past two weeks have brought the spectacle of Mr. Bush yukking it up at Graceland, flattering immigrant workers at a Dunkin'’ Donuts, patronizing a children'’s lemonade stand in Raleigh, N.C., and meeting the press in such comfy settings as an outside-the-filter press conference (in Chicago) and '“Larry King Live.'” The people, surely, are feeling better already about all that nasty business abroad.Or not. The bounce in the polls that once reliably followed these stunts is no more. As Americans contemplate the tragedy of Iraq, the triumph of Islamic jihadists in '“democracies'” we promoted for the Middle East, and the unimpeded power plays of Kim Jong Il and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, they see reality for what it is. Gone are the days when '“Mission Accomplished'” would fly. Barring a miracle, one legacy of the Bush Iraq-centric foreign policy will be the mess that those who come next will have to clean up.ANOTHER, equally significant, part of the Bush legacy is already evident throughout Washington, and not confined to foreign policy or the executive branch. Following the president'’s leadership, Congress has also embraced the virtual governance of substituting publicity stunts for substance.Instead of passing an immigration law, this Congress has entertained us with dueling immigration hearings. Instead of overseeing the war in Iraq or homeland security, its members have held press conferences announcing that they, if not the Pentagon, have at last found Saddam'’s weapons of mass destruction (degraded mustard gas and sarin canisters from the 1980'’s). Instead of promised post-DeLay reforms, the House concocted a sham Lobbying Accountability and Transparency Act that won'’t do away with the gifts and junkets politicians rake in from the Abramoffs of K Street. And let'’s not forget all the days devoted to resolutions about same-sex marriage, flag burning, the patriotism of The New York Times and the Pledge of Allegiance.'“Before long, Congress will be leaving on its summer vacation,'” Bob Schieffer of CBS News said two weeks ago. '“My question is, how will we know they are gone?'” By the calculation of USA Today, the current Congress is on track to spend fewer days in session than the '“do-nothing Congress'” Harry Truman gave hell to in 1948. No wonder its approval rating, for Republicans and Democrats together, is even lower than the president'’s. It'’s not only cowboy diplomacy that'’s dead at this point in the Bush era, but also functioning democracy as we used to know it."

July 16, 2006 · 8 min · musafir

People of Lebanon and the Cedars of Lebanon

Facing DestructionThe BBC reported that Israeli air strike on a convoy of civilians fleeing from Southern Lebanon killed 13 of them on July 15th. And there went President Bush's message to Israelis for restraint against civilian population. No one believed in his sincerity. American forces have killed more than 40,000 Iraqi civilians in the past 3-1/2 years of war. The current situation in Lebanon and Gaza is such that even with good intentions civilian casualties cannot be avoided, and good intentions are notably absent. Local residents told al-Jazeera TV the villagers were targeted after being ordered to leave Marwahin, and refused shelter by the UN forces. Ahmad Ali Ubayd said many did not own vehicles and a main road has been under continuous bombardment. "Where is the international justice when children, women, and the elderly are killed?" he said. Correspondents say there is nowhere safe to go for many trying to flee the south. In past hostilities much of the mainly Shia population of the south has sought refuge in the capital Beirut's largely Shia southern suburbs, but this time they are under attack too, the BBC's Jim Muir reports from Damour, south of Beirut. On Saturday, Israeli warplanes also hit the southern suburbs, which are a Hezbollah stronghold. Earlier, Hezbollah's al-Manar TV says three civilians were killed in an Israeli attack in Hermel, on the border with Syria. They also carried out raids in the north and the north-east of the country for the first time on Saturday. A number of bridges, petrol stations and key roads have also been hit, including the main road linking northern Lebanon to Syria. The Lebanese were just beginning to rebuild their lives, society and infrastructure after decades of being in the middle of a war zone. Beirut, the capital of Lebanon (once called Switzerland of the Middle East), was the epicenter of violence that raged between 1975 and 1990. The marks are still visible. Now it is back to ground zero. The Hezbollah remains adamant about their position and so do the Israelis in use of their vastly superior military prowess. Ordinary people die and each death leaves scars, causes ripples. The Hezbollah gains new recruits; the power of Israeli hard-liners grow. Sane voices drown in the clamor for blood and revenge. The recently elected Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel has unleashed the full force of Israel's army against Gaza and Beirut. It appears that dead and injured civilians, if they were given any consideration at all, were shrugged off as the cost for retaliation. Scott Wilson in the Post: "JERUSALEM, July 14 -- Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, elected just months ago on a promise to ease Israel's grip on the occupied Palestinian territories, now is fighting a two-front war on battlefields the Jewish state has occupied and abandoned before in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon. The outcome will determine not only the fate of three captured Israeli soldiers and the northern Israeli towns under rocket fire, but also his own goal of defining Israel's permanent borders."Efforts were underway for reforestation of the famed Cedars of Lebanon. North Lebanon, where the cedar groves are, has also come under air strikes. The fate of the famed trees is as uncertain as that of the Lebanese people.

July 15, 2006 · 3 min · musafir